OCR reaction: economists surprised but expect 2020 cut

The OCR remains on hold at 1%, as the Reserve Bank unveiled its latest decision and Monetary Policy Statement. 

The decision was a close call. According to the central bank's meeting notes, the Monetary Policy Committee "noted that the risks to the economy in the near term were tilted to the downside and agreed it would add further monetary stimulus if economic developments warranted it".

Westpac's Dominick Stephens expected a cut following weak inflation data earlier this week. He said the decision to hold showed the RBNZ was "not scared of staring down financial markets". 

"We always viewed it as a close call, and that's what the RBNZ said. In our view, the low point in the OCR cycle will be 0.75%," Stephens added. "There are a couple of things on my mind, the housing market is likely to be much stronger than the Reserve Bank is forecasting. On the other hand, I wouldn't be surprised if the global economic situation worsens before then. The balance of those two will decide whether there's a move in February."

Kiwibank's Jarrod Kerr said he was "surprised" by the move, and that the Reserve Bank left the OCR track unchanged. 

"They have given us the same 40% chance that another rate cut will be needed. They have said if things deteriorate they will keep cutting, but that they didn't have enough information to go lower today. We thought we had seen enough."

Brad Olsen of Infometrics said the central bank would wait to see whether its August cut was deep enough.

Olsen added: "The Reserve Bank has stuck to its guns this month and seems to be waiting and hoping that August’s 50 bp cut is enough to stimulate the economy. The Bank’s made it clear that it is prepared to cut again if conditions dictate."

Independent economist Michael Reddell hit out at the decision to keep rates on hold. 

"Inflation below target, risks to the downside, world economy still slowing, low or falling inflation expectations, all combine to make a strong case for a cut. But they sit on their hands. It is a poor decision and two successive MPSs in which they have wrong-footed markets suggests the problem is with them not the markets. They need to rethink their comms approach."